🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.